1.1 what did Mike Scott's fan do? why? He checked the page regularity and if any fact changed, he changed them back. Because today any person can write an articule in wikipedia and edit it if you are the owner.
1.2. Terry think wikipedia is a dangerous site, its a great idea, but the implementation isnt the correct. Because anybody can put information in that, and be considerated OK.
1.3. what did stephen glass do? Stephen, wrote articules were wrong. At 25 yr old, he was and successful journalist, but at 1998, was dicovered about his mistake, in 27 wrongs of 44 articules.
4. Yes. Both jornalist talk about the wikipedia. And if your are searching about a determinate topic, today you not only see wikipedia. You search in many sites, and see many examples about it. Its more easy detect if a source information is wrong or is bad.
5. The opinion of writer, is take care about the source information what we read. Because, we believe in the printed word, and not always, the printed word is the true. All is relative to the source.
CORRECTION: 1.1 what did Mike Scott's fan do? why? He checked the page regulaLY and if any fact WAS changed BY SOMEONE ELSE , he changed them back. Because today any person can write an article in wikipedia and edit it EVEN if you are NOTthe owner.
1.2. Terry thinkS wikipedia is a dangerous site, its a great idea, but the implementation isnt the correct ONE. Because anybody can put information THERE, and be considered OK.
1.3. what did stephen glass do? Stephen, wrote articules THAT were wrong. At THE AGE OF 25 , he was a successful journalist, but IN 1998, IT was dicovered THAT 27 OUT OF 44 OF his ARTICLES WERE WRONG.
4. Yes. Both jornalist talkED about the wikipedia. If your are searching about a SPECIFIC topic, today, you DOnot only seARCH IN wikipedia. You MAY search in many sites, and see VARIOUS examples OF it; THAT WAY it's EASIER TO detect WHETHER THE source is INACCURATE OR NOT. 5. The opinion of THE writer (THE WRITER'S OPINION), is TO LOOK careFULLY WHAT source OF information we read. Because, we believe in the printed word BUT IT'S not always TO TRUST. eEVERYTHING DEPENDS ON THE SOURCE.
1.1
ResponderEliminarwhat did Mike Scott's fan do? why?
He checked the page regularity and if any fact changed, he changed them back.
Because today any person can write an articule in wikipedia and edit it if you are the owner.
1.2.
Terry think wikipedia is a dangerous site, its a great idea, but the implementation isnt the correct.
Because anybody can put information in that, and be considerated OK.
1.3.
what did stephen glass do?
Stephen, wrote articules were wrong. At 25 yr old, he was and successful journalist, but at 1998, was dicovered about his
mistake, in 27 wrongs of 44 articules.
4. Yes. Both jornalist talk about the wikipedia. And if your are searching about a determinate topic, today you not only see
wikipedia. You search in many sites, and see many examples about it. Its more easy detect if a source information
is wrong or is bad.
5. The opinion of writer, is take care about the source information what we read. Because, we believe in the printed word,
and not always, the printed word is the true. All is relative to the source.
CORRECTION:
ResponderEliminar1.1
what did Mike Scott's fan do? why?
He checked the page regulaLY and if any fact WAS changed BY SOMEONE ELSE , he changed them back.
Because today any person can write an article in wikipedia and edit it EVEN if you are NOTthe owner.
1.2.
Terry thinkS wikipedia is a dangerous site, its a great idea, but the implementation isnt the correct ONE.
Because anybody can put information THERE, and be considered OK.
1.3.
what did stephen glass do?
Stephen, wrote articules THAT were wrong. At THE AGE OF 25 , he was a successful journalist, but IN 1998, IT was dicovered THAT 27 OUT OF 44 OF his ARTICLES WERE WRONG.
4. Yes. Both jornalist talkED about the wikipedia.
If your are searching about a SPECIFIC topic, today, you DOnot only seARCH IN wikipedia. You MAY search in many sites, and see VARIOUS examples OF it; THAT WAY it's EASIER TO detect WHETHER THE source is INACCURATE OR NOT.
5. The opinion of THE writer (THE WRITER'S OPINION), is TO LOOK careFULLY WHAT source OF information we read. Because, we believe in the printed word BUT IT'S not always TO TRUST. eEVERYTHING DEPENDS ON THE SOURCE.